How Incomplete Nongrantor Trusts Can Help Avoid State Income Taxes

With the federal gift and estate tax exemption at $5.45 million for 2016, traditional estate planning may not be helpful for many people. Instead, those whose estates are below the exemption amount are shifting their focus to income tax reduction. High-income taxpayers — particularly those who live in high-income-tax states — may want to consider incomplete nongrantor trusts, which make it possible to reduce or even eliminate state taxes on trust income.

Defining an incomplete nongrantor trust

Generally, trusts are classified either as grantor trusts or nongrantor trusts. In a grantor trust, the “grantor” establishes the trust and retains certain powers over the trust. The grantor is treated as the trust’s owner for income tax purposes and continues to pay taxes on income generated by the trust assets.

In a nongrantor trust, the grantor relinquishes certain controls over the trust so that he or she isn’t considered the owner for income tax purposes. Instead, the trust becomes a separate legal entity, with income tax responsibility shifting to the trust itself. By setting up the trust in a no-income-tax state (typically by having it administered by a trust company located in that state), it’s possible to avoid state income taxes. The grantor is entitled to receive distributions from the trust, usually at a distribution committee’s discretion.

Ordinarily, you make a taxable gift to the trust beneficiaries when you contribute assets to a nongrantor trust. To avoid triggering gift taxes, or using your gift and estate tax exemption, structure the trust as an incomplete nongrantor trust. In other words, relinquish just enough control to ensure nongrantor status, while retaining enough control so that transfers to the trust aren’t considered completed gifts for gift-tax purposes.

In addition to the positives discussed in this article, incomplete nongrantor trusts offer asset protection against creditors’ claims. However, one important caveat: If your home state imposes its income tax on out-of-state trusts based on the grantor’s state of residence, this strategy won’t work.

Using an example

Suppose you live in a state that imposes an 8% income tax and you have a $4 million investment portfolio that earns an 8% annual return, or $320,000 per year, made up of 50% growth, which isn’t currently subject to tax, and 50% currently taxable income. By using the incomplete nongrantor trust strategy described above, you can save $12,800 in taxes (8% of $320,000 × 50%) for the first year, assuming your state doesn’t extend its income tax to out-of-state trusts established by state residents. Presuming similar results, in subsequent years your savings would be compounded.

Assume, for instance, that you reinvest your tax savings in order to grow your portfolio more quickly. Over a 20-year period, an incomplete nongrantor trust would produce a total benefit (state income tax savings plus earnings on reinvested tax savings) of nearly $1.1 million.

Analyzing the benefits

Remember, assets you place in the trust should produce income that the grantor doesn’t need. If the grantor takes money out, trust taxable income could follow to the grantor and be taxed in the grantor’s state of residence. 

Incomplete nongrantor trusts aren’t right for everyone. It depends on your particular circumstances and the tax laws in your home state. For example, they’ve been established in favorable tax jurisdictions, such as Delaware, Florida and Nevada.

While this strategy can produce significant state income tax savings, it may increase federal estate and income taxes. Why? Because incomplete gifts remain in your estate for federal estate tax purposes. And nongrantor trusts pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate (currently, 39.6%) once income reaches $12,400 (for 2016).

Is it right for you?

To determine whether an incomplete nongrantor trust is right for you, weigh the potential state income tax savings against the potential federal estate and income tax costs. Ask your advisor to conduct a cost-benefit analysis to find out.

© 2016


Information provided on this web site “Site” by Thompson Greenspon is intended for reference only. The information contained herein is designed solely to provide guidance to the user, and is not intended to be a substitute for the user seeking personalized professional advice based on specific factual situations. This Site may contain references to certain laws and regulations which may change over time and should be interpreted only in light of particular circumstances. As such, information on this Site does NOT constitute professional accounting, tax or legal advice and should not be interpreted as such.

Although Thompson Greenspon has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate, Thompson Greenspon, and its shareholders, managers and staff, make no warranties, expressed or implied, on the information provided on this Site, or about any other website which you may access through this Site. The user accepts the information as is and assumes all responsibility for the use of such information. Thompson Greenspon also does not warrant that this Site, various services provided through this Site, and any information, software or other material downloaded from this Site, will be uninterrupted, error-free, omission-free or free of viruses or other harmful components.

Information contained on this Site is protected by copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the expressed, written consent of Thompson Greenspon. All rights are reserved.

Share: