Materiality is a core concept that shapes the entire financial reporting process. In simple terms, materiality helps determine which financial information is significant enough to influence decisions and which details likely won’t affect the overall picture. Understanding how experienced certified public accountants (CPAs) evaluate materiality can help you prepare reliable financial reports and avoid surprises when working with external advisors.

Materiality defined

Under U.S. accounting standards, financial information is “material” if omitting or misstating it could influence users’ decisions based on the financial statements. Auditing standards apply the same principle, focusing on whether misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably influence users’ economic decisions.

Although wording varies slightly across reporting frameworks, the underlying principle remains consistent: Materiality is user-focused and requires professional judgment informed by both quantitative and qualitative factors. It’s not a mechanical percentage test.

How auditors set and apply materiality thresholds

An audit provides reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. External auditors rely on their professional judgment to determine what’s material for each company, based on such factors as:

  • Size,
  • Industry,
  • Internal controls, and
  • Financial performance.

When planning an audit, the auditor establishes overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole, often using a benchmark such as a percentage of pretax income, revenue or total assets. The auditor also sets “performance materiality,” a lower threshold used to reduce the risk that undetected misstatements, in aggregate, exceed overall materiality. In some cases, auditors establish separate materiality thresholds for particular high-risk accounts or disclosures.

During fieldwork, materiality affects the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures. It influences sample sizes, risk assessments and which accounts receive more scrutiny. Auditors also evaluate significant year-over-year fluctuations and unexpected trends. For example, if shipping or direct labor costs increased by 30% in 2025, it may raise a red flag, especially if it didn’t correlate with an increase in revenue. Businesses should be ready to explain why costs increased and provide supporting documents (such as invoices or payroll records) for auditors to review.

Auditors may need to reassess materiality if circumstances change from year to year, or even during an engagement. Moreover, auditors must apply significant judgment when evaluating materiality. For instance, a relatively small misstatement may still be material if it masks a trend, affects compliance with loan covenants, triggers management bonuses or involves fraud.

Beyond audits

Materiality also plays a role in other types of accounting engagements. In a financial statement review, the CPA provides limited assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement. The CPA performs inquiry and analytical procedures and reports whether anything came to his or her attention suggesting the financial statements may be materially misstated. Unlike an audit, a review doesn’t involve detailed testing of transactions or internal controls. However, materiality still plays an important role in designing review procedures and evaluating unusual fluctuations, significant estimates and financial statement disclosures.

In a financial statement compilation, the CPA provides no assurance. The accountant presents financial information in the proper format but doesn’t verify its accuracy. Professional standards require the CPA to consider whether the financial statements appear materially misstated or misleading. If information is incomplete, inconsistent or obviously incorrect, the CPA may need to request revisions — or, in some cases, withdraw from the engagement.

Why it matters

The concept of materiality also has strategic implications for business owners and their internal finance and accounting teams. Not every minor bookkeeping error requires immediate correction, and not every fluctuation deserves the same level of attention. Understanding materiality helps you focus attention where it matters most,  on the accounts, estimates and risks that could meaningfully affect profitability, cash flow, debt covenant compliance and overall business value.

Rather than striving for perfection in every minor detail, management can use materiality as a decision-making filter. It supports smarter allocation of accounting resources, more effective internal controls and clearer financial reporting. A shared understanding of what’s truly material also strengthens discussions with lenders, investors and other stakeholders by keeping the focus on the issues that influence business outcomes.

Putting materiality to work for you

Materiality is more than an accounting concept, it’s a practical tool for better financial decision-making. Proactively evaluating significant changes in your financial statements and understanding what matters most to your stakeholders can strengthen your reporting. Contact us to learn more.

© 2026

Icon for Thompson Greenspon
Thompson Greenspon

This blog post was provided by Thompson Greenspon. If you have questions or concerns regarding this content, please contact us.